Facebook
youtube
Home
What's new
New posts
New display videos
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Wiki
Search wiki pages
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Display videos
New display videos
Search display videos
Display locations
Displays by region
Members
Current visitors
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Close Menu
New to Christmas lighting?
Get started with the
AusChristmasLighting 101 Manual
Home
Forums
Welcome
101 display basics
Wiring Pixels to Falcon F16V3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="i13, post: 117056, member: 21708"] That should work. You might (or might not) want to zig-zag the negative with the data at the top of the tree. Doing so would provide a more consistent reference for the data but it creates negative loops. A more consistent reference can prevent flicker but negative loops can cause flicker. There's no perfect answer for whether or not to do that and you're likely to be fine either way. It is okay to halve the number of power injection cables and power two strands per cable if the cables can handle it. The way to do it is to connect the power from the injection cable to both strands at the base of the tree. Ray Wu sells T splitters that are designed for this purpose. You'd power the first strand on its own but then the the others can have a T splitter that carries the data from one strand to the next whilst also powering both strands. [/QUOTE]
Verification
The title of our introductory lighting manual contains a three digit number. What is that number? Clue: Display basics forum
Post reply
Home
Forums
Welcome
101 display basics
Wiring Pixels to Falcon F16V3
Top