pkittenguin124
New elf
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2024
- Messages
- 2
Hi all, hope your November/early season is going well!
I hope this is the correct place for all this, very sorry if it is not.
I have started doing tests on my display. I am new to this, and it is a relatively small display - only about 1500 channels total. I have encountered some issues with xSchedule, the first being packets per second counter drops occasionally (I do get output though), and the turtle appears next to the counter. The other is also related to the packets per second as well. For some reason, xSchedule is only outputting 42 packets per second, when it should theoretically be around 80 (right?). The sequences are 40FPS FSEQ files, and the network is DDP. And since DDP only permits 1440 channels per packet, it should be 80 right? I have xLights configured to output 1500 channels, andboth are using the same xlights_networks.xml file. Any ideas on how to fix this?
In terms of the packet drop issue, I should mention that the playback computer is an old 2012 MacBook Pro with a dual core i5, 512GB hard drive, 4GB ram. Definitely not very powerful in terms of today's standards. It is running Mojave, the 2018 release. Multi-threaded transmission is enabled, which seemed to yield some slight improvements. The copy of xLights that is running is an old version of xLights for Mac with xSchedule (2019 or so). I made the sequences on my primary laptop, and transferred the fseq files onto the playback computer. All of the audio playback files are WAV, which should take less processing time compared to MP3. The playback computer is connected to a Netgear GS305 gigabit switch, which connects to the controller which is a 2022 edition Genius Long Range. The controller network is connected to the built in Ethernet port on the Mac, and it is separate from the home network. Could the laptop possibly be too slow to run the 40FPS sequences? xSchedule is using about 14 percent of the CPU when I looked in Activity Monitor, no other big processes that I can see. I am thinking maybe replacing the hard drive with an SSD might fix this, anyone else have similar experience?
Thanks for your time, and happy holidays!
I hope this is the correct place for all this, very sorry if it is not.
I have started doing tests on my display. I am new to this, and it is a relatively small display - only about 1500 channels total. I have encountered some issues with xSchedule, the first being packets per second counter drops occasionally (I do get output though), and the turtle appears next to the counter. The other is also related to the packets per second as well. For some reason, xSchedule is only outputting 42 packets per second, when it should theoretically be around 80 (right?). The sequences are 40FPS FSEQ files, and the network is DDP. And since DDP only permits 1440 channels per packet, it should be 80 right? I have xLights configured to output 1500 channels, andboth are using the same xlights_networks.xml file. Any ideas on how to fix this?
In terms of the packet drop issue, I should mention that the playback computer is an old 2012 MacBook Pro with a dual core i5, 512GB hard drive, 4GB ram. Definitely not very powerful in terms of today's standards. It is running Mojave, the 2018 release. Multi-threaded transmission is enabled, which seemed to yield some slight improvements. The copy of xLights that is running is an old version of xLights for Mac with xSchedule (2019 or so). I made the sequences on my primary laptop, and transferred the fseq files onto the playback computer. All of the audio playback files are WAV, which should take less processing time compared to MP3. The playback computer is connected to a Netgear GS305 gigabit switch, which connects to the controller which is a 2022 edition Genius Long Range. The controller network is connected to the built in Ethernet port on the Mac, and it is separate from the home network. Could the laptop possibly be too slow to run the 40FPS sequences? xSchedule is using about 14 percent of the CPU when I looked in Activity Monitor, no other big processes that I can see. I am thinking maybe replacing the hard drive with an SSD might fix this, anyone else have similar experience?
Thanks for your time, and happy holidays!
Last edited: