BradsXmasLights
WiFi Interactive
There's new LED pixel strip out with GS8206 and GS8208 chipsets! So with just a datasheet and very limited info online about it, I ordered 75m of GS8208 and am hoping for the best. This thread will demo my findings with it.
This GS stuff is made by Genesis Systech and is protocol-compatible with the WS2811 variants by WorldSemi
First off some basic specs:
* GS8208 is 12V based and has an integrated IC - 1 LED per pixel. This would be the closet equivalent to WS2815.
* GS8206 has a separate IC chip - multiple LEDs per pixel. Voltages & LEDs per pixel vary; eg 24V, 7 LED/pixel.
* GS820x is 4 wire based, positive, negative, data and data-backup lines. Backup data (also on WS2813/WS2815) is wired in a leap-frog style configuration. If data isn't received from the previous pixel on the (primary) data line; signaling is then sourced from the backup line. This is wired back to the output of the node two pixels back - so you can effectively bypass a dodgy pixel entirely.
* GS8208 strip is currently $4.80USD/meter from RAY (double the price of WS2811)
* GS820x is 8bit - but has 8bit to 12bit gamma correction
* GS820x has an automatic test mode
* GS820x R/G/B LED elements are wired internally in series
* Datasheet with more electronic engineering specs: https://www.deskontrol.net/descargas/datasheets/GS8208.pdf
So my question #1 - is it really protocol-compatible? Answer is Yes. Tested with a (now old) J1SYS P2, it worked perfectly first go.
As soon as power is connected - without data signal being generated - the lights will enter a self-test mode. This started off as a simple red, green, blue, yellow,etc colour cycle, then switched to rather presentable rainbow patterns. In fact it did so many different patterns you could just connect power and sell it to people with static displays.
Now the catch with this self test is it starts instantly upon power on & it took about 4 seconds for my J1SYS P2 controller to 'boot up' and kill-off this automatic self test. (The J1SYS must've been sending out blank timing data; because i wasn't sending it E131 at that stage.) Switching power off to the controller then made the auto-test patterns restart. This has the potential to be an "annoying" feature!
Pumping some existing sequences to it; fades looked super smooth thanks to the single LED per pixel control. Not sure how much of this 12bit gamma correction is going on - but everything looked very fluid. However I did notice that Pink colour rendering looked rather whitish.
Next was power consumption measurements, with the entire 5M roll (150 LEDs), powered via both ends connected to a 12V Lab Power Supply. I've done this test with Ws2811 too and other lights so I can formulate PSU estimates.
Now WTF is going on here! Notice how single R/G/B measurements are off the charts compared to 2811. Mixing colours, which on 2811 would traditionally increase current makes very little difference, Infact mixing colours reduces consumption! I don't believe this is voltage drop related, powering from one end was only marginally lower draw. What probably is at play is the internal series-wiring of the R,G,B, LED elements and their PWM drive circuitry.
Feeding 12V to each LED too won't be helping either - but it's a price to pay compared to dealing the hassle of 5V based voltage drop over longer distances. In reality, it'll mean higher average power draw compared to 2811, just not higher total/peak power draw. This may be a surprise factor for some people upgrading if their cabling gauge wasn't up to spec to begin with.
More testing to come; including video of side by side runs of GS8208 Vs WS2811
This GS stuff is made by Genesis Systech and is protocol-compatible with the WS2811 variants by WorldSemi
First off some basic specs:
* GS8208 is 12V based and has an integrated IC - 1 LED per pixel. This would be the closet equivalent to WS2815.
* GS8206 has a separate IC chip - multiple LEDs per pixel. Voltages & LEDs per pixel vary; eg 24V, 7 LED/pixel.
* GS820x is 4 wire based, positive, negative, data and data-backup lines. Backup data (also on WS2813/WS2815) is wired in a leap-frog style configuration. If data isn't received from the previous pixel on the (primary) data line; signaling is then sourced from the backup line. This is wired back to the output of the node two pixels back - so you can effectively bypass a dodgy pixel entirely.
* GS8208 strip is currently $4.80USD/meter from RAY (double the price of WS2811)
* GS820x is 8bit - but has 8bit to 12bit gamma correction
* GS820x has an automatic test mode
* GS820x R/G/B LED elements are wired internally in series
* Datasheet with more electronic engineering specs: https://www.deskontrol.net/descargas/datasheets/GS8208.pdf
So my question #1 - is it really protocol-compatible? Answer is Yes. Tested with a (now old) J1SYS P2, it worked perfectly first go.
As soon as power is connected - without data signal being generated - the lights will enter a self-test mode. This started off as a simple red, green, blue, yellow,etc colour cycle, then switched to rather presentable rainbow patterns. In fact it did so many different patterns you could just connect power and sell it to people with static displays.
Now the catch with this self test is it starts instantly upon power on & it took about 4 seconds for my J1SYS P2 controller to 'boot up' and kill-off this automatic self test. (The J1SYS must've been sending out blank timing data; because i wasn't sending it E131 at that stage.) Switching power off to the controller then made the auto-test patterns restart. This has the potential to be an "annoying" feature!
Pumping some existing sequences to it; fades looked super smooth thanks to the single LED per pixel control. Not sure how much of this 12bit gamma correction is going on - but everything looked very fluid. However I did notice that Pink colour rendering looked rather whitish.
Next was power consumption measurements, with the entire 5M roll (150 LEDs), powered via both ends connected to a 12V Lab Power Supply. I've done this test with Ws2811 too and other lights so I can formulate PSU estimates.
Now WTF is going on here! Notice how single R/G/B measurements are off the charts compared to 2811. Mixing colours, which on 2811 would traditionally increase current makes very little difference, Infact mixing colours reduces consumption! I don't believe this is voltage drop related, powering from one end was only marginally lower draw. What probably is at play is the internal series-wiring of the R,G,B, LED elements and their PWM drive circuitry.
Feeding 12V to each LED too won't be helping either - but it's a price to pay compared to dealing the hassle of 5V based voltage drop over longer distances. In reality, it'll mean higher average power draw compared to 2811, just not higher total/peak power draw. This may be a surprise factor for some people upgrading if their cabling gauge wasn't up to spec to begin with.
More testing to come; including video of side by side runs of GS8208 Vs WS2811
Last edited: